Workloads are sometimes deployed in specific AWS regions based on legacy decisions, developer convenience, or perceived performance requirements. However, regional EC2 pricing can vary significantly, and placing instances in a suboptimal region can lead to higher compute costs, increased data transfer charges, or both. In particular, workloads that frequently communicate with resources in other regions—or that serve a user base concentrated elsewhere—can incur unnecessary costs. Re-evaluating regional placement can reduce these costs without compromising performance or availability when done strategically.

GCP VM instances are often provisioned with more CPU or memory than needed, especially when using custom machine types or legacy templates. If an instance consistently consumes only a small portion of its allocated resources, it likely represents an opportunity to reduce costs through rightsizing. Without proactive reviews, these oversized instances can remain unnoticed and continue to incur unnecessary charges.

Azure VMs are frequently provisioned with more vCPU and memory than needed, often based on template defaults or peak demand assumptions. When a VM operates well below its capacity for an extended period, it presents an opportunity to reduce costs through rightsizing. Without regular usage reviews, these inefficiencies can persist indefinitely.

EC2 instances are often overprovisioned based on rough estimates, legacy patterns, or performance buffer assumptions. If an instance consistently uses only a small fraction of its provisioned CPU or memory, it likely represents an opportunity for rightsizing. These inefficiencies persist unless usage is periodically reviewed and instance types are adjusted to align with actual workload requirements.