Using High-Cost Bedrock Models for Low-Complexity Tasks

CER:

AWS-Compute-3917

Service Category

Cloud Provider

AWS

Service Name

AWS Bedrock

Inefficiency Type

Overpowered Model Selection

Explanation

Many Bedrock workloads involve low-complexity tasks such as tagging, classification, routing, entity extraction, keyword detection, document triage, or lightweight summarization. These tasks **do not require** the advanced reasoning or generative capabilities of higher-cost models such as Claude 3 Opus or comparable premium models. When organizations default to a high-end model across all applications—or fail to periodically reassess model selection—they pay elevated costs for work that could be performed effectively by smaller, lower-cost models such as Claude Haiku or other compact model families. This inefficiency becomes more pronounced in high-volume, repetitive workloads where token counts scale quickly.

Relevant Billing Model

Bedrock typically charges per input and output token (or per inference unit for some models). Larger, more capable models have substantially higher cost per token than smaller, task-optimized models. Using premium models for simple operations increases cost without improving quality.

Detection

Identify workloads generating simple, deterministic, or low-complexity outputs that do not require advanced generative reasoning
Review Bedrock model choices to determine whether premium models are used across multiple applications by default
Analyze token usage patterns showing high spend on repetitive or structured tasks
Evaluate whether smaller or task-specific models could provide comparable accuracy and latency
Assess whether engineering teams lack model selection guidelines, leading to overuse of high-cost options

Remediation

Select the smallest Bedrock model family capable of meeting accuracy, latency, and quality requirements
Use compact or task-optimized models (e.g., Claude 3 Haiku or equivalent lightweight models) for classification, extraction, routing, and deterministic tasks
Establish internal guidelines to prevent premium models from being used as global defaults
Periodically re-evaluate deployed models as new, cost-efficient model families become available
Test model outputs across multiple model tiers to ensure that quality remains acceptable after right-sizing

Relevant Documentation

Submit Feedback