Submit feedback on
Suboptimal Cache Usage for Repetitive Azure OpenAI Workloads
We've received your feedback.
Thanks for reaching out!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Close
Suboptimal Cache Usage for Repetitive Azure OpenAI Workloads
CER:
Azure-AI-2825
Service Category
AI
Cloud Provider
Azure
Service Name
Azure Cognitive Services
Inefficiency Type
Missing Caching Layer
Explanation

A large share of production AI workloads include repetitive or static requests—such as classification labels, routing decisions, FAQ responses, metadata extraction, or deterministic prompt templates. Without a caching layer, every repeated request is sent to the model, incurring full token charges and increasing latency. Azure OpenAI does not provide native caching, so teams must implement caching at the application or API gateway layer. When caching is absent, workloads repeatedly spend tokens for identical outputs, creating avoidable cost. This inefficiency often arises when teams optimize only for correctness—not cost—and default to calling the model for every invocation regardless of whether the response is predictable.

Relevant Billing Model

Azure OpenAI on-demand usage is billed per input and output token. Re-running identical prompts consumes tokens unnecessarily when responses could be served from a cache. For workloads with repetitive queries, caching can reduce both cost and latency significantly.

Detection
  • Identify workloads that submit identical or highly similar prompts repeatedly
  • Review token usage patterns showing recurring spikes from deterministic or static queries
  • Examine application logs for repeated inference calls that produce identical responses
  • Assess whether any caching layer (API, CDN, application-level, vector cache) is implemented for repetitive workloads
Remediation
  • Implement an application-level or gateway-level caching layer for deterministic or repetitive inference requests
  • Cache outputs for classification, routing, metadata extraction, or FAQ-style responses
  • Define cache TTLs appropriate to the workload’s freshness requirements
  • Use normalized prompt signatures (hashing) to increase cache hit rates
  • Periodically review workload patterns to expand caching coverage as use cases evolve
Relevant Documentation
Submit Feedback