Cloud Provider
GCP Compute Engine
Inefficiency Type
Clear filters
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Showing
1234
out of
1234
inefficiencis
Filter
:
Filter
x
Underutilized VM Commitments Due to Architectural Drift
Compute
Cloud Provider
GCP
Service Name
GCP Compute Engine
Inefficiency Type
Underutilized Commitment

VM-based Committed Use Discounts in GCP offer cost savings for predictable workloads, but they are rigid: they apply only to specified VM types, quantities, and regions. When organizations evolve their architecture — such as moving to GKE (Kubernetes), Cloud Run, or autoscaling — usage patterns often shift away from the original commitments. Because GCP lacks flexible reallocation options like AWS Convertible RIs or Savings Plans, underutilized commitments lead to sustained, silent waste. This is especially common when workload changes go uncoordinated with finance or centralized planning.

Missing Scheduled Shutdown for Non-Production Compute Engine Instances
Compute
Cloud Provider
GCP
Service Name
GCP Compute Engine
Inefficiency Type
Inefficient Configuration

Development and test environments on Compute Engine are commonly provisioned and left running around the clock, even if only used during business hours. This results in wasteful spend on compute time that could be eliminated by scheduling shutdowns during idle periods. GCP enables scheduling via native tools such as Cloud Scheduler, Cloud Functions, or Terraform automation. Stopping VMs during off-hours preserves boot disks and instance metadata while halting compute billing.

Underutilized GCP VM Instance
Compute
Cloud Provider
GCP
Service Name
GCP Compute Engine
Inefficiency Type
Overprovisioned Resource

GCP VM instances are often provisioned with more CPU or memory than needed, especially when using custom machine types or legacy templates. If an instance consistently consumes only a small portion of its allocated resources, it likely represents an opportunity to reduce costs through rightsizing. Without proactive reviews, these oversized instances can remain unnoticed and continue to incur unnecessary charges.

There are no inefficiency matches the current filters.