Cloud Provider
Azure AKS
Inefficiency Type
Clear filters
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Showing
1234
out of
1234
inefficiencis
Filter
:
Filter
x
Orphaned Kubernetes Resources
Compute
Cloud Provider
Azure
Service Name
Azure AKS
Inefficiency Type
Orphaned Resource

Kubernetes environments often accumulate unused resources over time as applications evolve. Common examples include Persistent Volume Claims (PVCs) backed by Azure Disks, Services that trigger load balancer provisioning, or stale ConfigMaps and Secrets. When the associated deployments or pods are removed, these resources may remain unless explicitly deleted.

In AKS, this can lead to unmanaged costs, such as idle managed disks from orphaned PVCs or public load balancers from Services of type LoadBalancer. Even lightweight resources like unused Secrets or ConfigMaps degrade cluster hygiene and can introduce security or operational risk. This inefficiency is common across Kubernetes environments and is scoped here to AKS.

Orphaned and Overprovisioned Resources in AKS Clusters
Compute
Cloud Provider
Azure
Service Name
Azure AKS
Inefficiency Type
Inefficient Configuration

Clusters often accumulate unused components when applications are terminated or environments are cloned. These include PVCs backed by Managed Disks, Services that still front Azure Load Balancers, and test namespaces that are no longer maintained. Node pools are frequently overprovisioned, especially in multi-tenant or CI environments.

The cost impact of these idle resources is magnified in organizations with many environments or without standardized cleanup routines. Since billing is resource-specific, even low-cost items like Managed Disks, load balancer rules, and frontend configurations can accumulate meaningful waste over time.

There are no inefficiency matches the current filters.